The Worst ICE Agents We Identified In 2025
We began documenting ICE activity in June of this year. In just six months, we have gathered over 1000 federal agents in our public ICE List database, and in that, have witnessed the worst of the worst of Trump’s authoritarian push across the United States. These agents brought intimidation, terror and even death onto the streets of the USA, and all in the name of an orange man with a history of child rape.
In these 6 months, we’ve learned a great deal about the agents involved. They come from different backgrounds, operate in different regions, and present themselves in different ways, but some arrive on our radar with far more dangerous behaviors and beliefs than others.
To close out the year, we are publishing a list of the ten worst ICE agents we have identified so far. This is not an exhaustive list. There are agents who will almost certainly appear in future editions of this list once positive identification is confirmed. But this year’s list already includes everything from agents involved in the arrest of elected officials to an agent implicated in a murder.
This ranking is based on documented conduct, verified footage, eyewitness testimony, and repeated appearances across multiple incidents.
10. Dominic Vitale
Dominic Vitale has been repeatedly identified at enforcement actions connected to Federal Plaza in New York. While he does not appear to be the primary aggressor in the incidents documented so far, his continued presence places him squarely within operations targeting people attempting to follow legal immigration processes.
Vitale’s conduct becomes more significant in the context of the arrest of 11 elected officials who sought to inspect or challenge enforcement activity at Federal Plaza. In these arrests, Vitale involved himself in the criminalisation of oversight itself. By refusing to disengage from operations that resulted in the detention of lawmakers, Vitale effectively aligned himself with an authoritarian regime that treats democratic accountability as an obstacle to be neutralised.
Vitale is not an uninvolved bystander. In the incident in question, he both took part in the arrest an removal of politicians from the building, and later, prevented protesters from getting near the building outside.
9. William Krejci
William Krejci has been identified in the same operational environment as Dominic Vitale, including during the Federal Plaza incident involving the arrest of elected officials. Unlike Vitale, however, Krejci’s documented conduct escalates into direct and documented use of force.
During the Federal Plaza incident, Krejci was observed acting more aggressively than several agents around him. More significantly, in separate documented encounters, Krejci has been captured using pepper spray against peaceful protesters. The deployment of chemical agents against non-violent demonstrators represents a clear and deliberate escalation, moving beyond coercive enforcement into punitive crowd control.
Krejci is ranked above Vitale on this list not only for his involvement in the same authoritarian suppression of oversight, but because he has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to use force unnecessarily. This pattern places him higher than agents whose conduct, while still abusive, however, these places could very well swap once more incidents are uncovered.
8. Samantha Camlica
This agent has been present at a significant proportion of arrests carried out inside and around Federal Plaza in New York. Federal Plaza is a location where people actively attempt to comply with legal immigration procedures, making the nature of enforcement there especially significant. Across multiple encounters, this agent has displayed a consistent pattern of aggressive, dismissive, and force-forward behavior toward detainees. While full biographical details are still being verified, the volume and consistency of appearances alone warrant inclusion on this list.
Samantha Camlica is one of the most recently identified agents in our investigation, yet she is already among the most prevalent. She appears in nearly every Federal Plaza case currently under review, notably excluding the incident involving the arrest of 11 elected officials. Her absence from that specific escalation does not mitigate her role elsewhere, instead, it highlights the regularity with which she is deployed against civilians seeking lawful immigration pathways, as her absence was noted by everyone only because of her level or presence on the ground at Federal Plaza.
Camlica consistently targets individuals attempting to follow legal processes. The sheer frequency of her presence, combined with her repeated aggressive conduct, places her above other Federal Plaza agents on this list. Unlike agents whose ranking is driven by singular escalations, Camlica’ placement reflects sustained, routine participation in coercive enforcement directed at those attempting to comply with the law.
7. Brenden Cuni
Brenden Cuni has appeared repeatedly across enforcement actions spanning multiple states, including New York, Boston, and Minnesota. In most documented incidents, Cuni appears to operate in a supervisory or leadership capacity. Rather than intervening to de-escalate volatile situations, he has been observed defending abusive conduct by other agents, displaying unsafe firearm handling, and threatening protesters.
Cuni’s conduct has escalated notably since his identification in October. In Minnesota, he was involved in an incident in which a pregnant woman was assaulted during an enforcement action, as Cuni’s collegue drags her along the ground, as Cuni himself points his taser and gun aimlessly at the surrounding crowd. The presence of a senior agent during such an assault, and the absence of any corrective or de-escalatory response, further underscores his role in normalising violence rather than preventing it.
In another documented incident, Cuni defended the racial profiling and temporary detention of a Black New Yorker who was ultimately released without charges. Taken together, these actions demonstrate a consistent pattern: Cuni does not merely fail to intervene in abusive situations, he actively legitimises them. His role as a senior presence makes this pattern especially consequential, as it signals approval and sets the tone for agents operating under him.
6. Victor Mojica
Victor Mojica has been identified as an agent operating primarily out of Federal Plaza in New York and is widely understood to hold a supervisory role within enforcement teams stationed there. He has been repeatedly linked to incidents involving physical aggression, including documented assaults on women inside the building.
His repeated presence in high-conflict encounters, combined with the severity of the force applied and the absence of meaningful restraint, marks Mojica as one of the more dangerous figures identified during this investigation. His role as a senior agent further compounds the risk, as his actions function not merely as isolated abuses, but as tacit approval for violence within the enforcement environment he oversees.
5. Thomas Phillips
Thomas Phillips was identified through video evidence and the testimony of the family of Jose Campoyo. Footage shows Phillips approaching with a rifle already drawn, pointing the weapon at both the father and son, physically assaulting the father, and threatening lethal force when asked for a badge number or warrant. According to testimony, Phillips later laughed about destroying the family and participated in restraining the victim while making threats. The conduct documented here goes far beyond enforcement and into clear intimidation and abuse of power.
For some reason, Phillips hasn’t achieved the infamy of others on this list following his identification by our team, but is clearly amongst the worst.
4. Thomas Parsons
Thomas Parsons operated as part of a consistent Border Patrol enforcement pairing in Illinois throughout October, during a period marked by repeated violent assaults. Across multiple documented incidents, Parsons functioned as part of a coordinated unit rather than an isolated actor.
Parsons’ placement on this list reflects the frequency and regularity of his involvement in these encounters, as a part of “Operation Midway Blitz”. While he is not always the most visibly aggressive figure, his repeated participation alongside Donahue situates him within a pattern of coercive and violent enforcement. His presence contributes to the normalisation of force, intimidation, and escalation during operations that routinely crossed well beyond any legitimate enforcement necessity.
3. Timothy Donahue
Timothy Donahue is ranked above Parsons because he serves as the escalation point within the same team of agents. In a documented incident, Donahue pointed a firearm at unarmed protesters and threatened to shoot them if they did not move back. The explicit threat of lethal force against civilians, absent any immediate danger, represents a significant and deliberate escalation.
Together, Parsons and Donahue function as a team. What separates Donahue is his willingness to introduce the threat of deadly force as a tool of crowd control. His actions demonstrate a readiness to intimidate and an acceptance of lethal escalation as an enforcement tactic, elevating him above his partner in severity and risk. What’s more is that the social media uncovered shows a dark system of beliefs living inside the head of the agent.
2. Jack C. Ravencamp
Perhaps the most controversial placement on this list, but one that we believe shows the true nature of the regime.
Jack C. Ravencamp has been repeatedly linked to violent enforcement actions, just like everyone else on this list. What elevates him further is the presence of a visibly and poorly covered extremist tattoo consistent with a swastika.
While ideology alone is not the basis for inclusion on this list, the combination of extremist symbolism and repeated violent conduct raises serious concerns. Ravenkamp’s actions, taken together with these indicators, place him near the top of this ranking.
#1 – Arian Moore
Arian Moore is ranked number one due to his involvement in the murder of Silverio González in Illinois. This case represents the most severe outcome documented during this six-month investigation; the loss of life at the hands of a federal agent during Trump’s unlawful overreach of power.
We don’t yet know if Moore was the agent behind the killing itself, but we are aware the response that followed, which would put him at number one by itself. In the immediate aftermath of the killing, these agents offered an official account of events that framed the shooting as justified and unavoidable. That narrative was rapidly undone by available evidence, including video footage and witness testimony, which contradicted key elements of the initial claims. The speed with which the official version collapsed raised all put proved the agents wanted to keep the public in the dark.
The combination of lethal force and an apparent attempt to misrepresent what occurred sets this case apart from all others documented this year. Taken together, these elements represent the clearest example of unchecked enforcement power identified during this investigation, and the highest possible threshold for inclusion on this list.
The ICE List is a monster project, a project we will have to uphold for at least 3 more years, and costing us a lot of time and a little bit of money. If you’re in a position to be able to make a donation to lighten the burden of that, we would be greatly appreciative. Thank you all for your continued help and support.
 |
|